General Carowinds discussion
By Dukeis#1
#21327
July 9, 2007

Cedar Fair Entertainment Co., the nation's third-largest theme-park operator, has quietly reached out to private equity firms to gauge their interest in a buyout on the condition that the company's management team remains in place, The Post has learned.

According to two sources close to the situation, Cedar Fair has tapped Bear Stearns to conduct a small, highly targeted auction for the company.

A spokeswoman for Cedar Fair declined to comment and calls to bankers at Bear Stearns were not returned.

Among those contacted by Bear Stearns are Apollo Management and Thomas H. Lee Partners. Bear also reached out to a potential European suitor, according to one source.

Others include Providence Equity Partners, Texas Pacific Group and the Carlyle Group - all of which either reviewed or were actively involved in the recent auctions for Six Flags and Paramount Parks - as well as the Blackstone Group, which owns Merlin Entertainment Group, home to Legolands parks and most recently, Madame Tussauds wax museums.

So far, however, interest among the buyer pool has been tepid, according to one source.

The problem is the ticket to ride won't come cheap, sources said. The company, which has a market capitalization of $1.5 billion and $1.8 billion in debt, is projected to generate about $330 million in cash flow this year. A 10 times cash-flow multiple typical of theme-park deals would equate to a price tag of $3.3 billion, and an 11 times multiple to just under $4 billion.

Sandusky, Ohio-based Cedar Fair owns 12 amusement parks, six water parks and six hotels, including Knott's Berry Farm in California and Star Trek: The Experience in Las Vegas. Only Disney and Six Flags are bigger players in the theme-park world.

Cedar Fair essentially doubled its size when it beat out many of the same private equity firms it is now courting to acquire Paramount Parks from CBS in a $1.24 billion cash deal last year.

That deal - in which Bear Stearns also served as financial adviser - appears to have re-energized Cedar Fair CEO Richard Kinzel, 66, who has signed a new contract to stay at the controls until 2012. His $1.2 million annual salary includes financial incentives related to the company's performance.

Kinzel's desire to remain on board after a sale is no doubt fueled in part by the wave of leveraged buyouts with terms that not only kept managers in place but signed them to lucrative contracts with equity stakes.

Cedar Fair stock rose 30 cents Friday to $28.84 in New York Stock Exchange composite trading. The shares are up 19 percent during the year-earlier period.

**********************

By Peter Lauria, from <a href='http://www.nypost.com/seven/07092007/business/ticket_to_ride_business_peter_lauria.htm' target='_blank'>The New York Post</a>.
User avatar
By coasterbruh
#21334
Not suprising at all...and here I am thinking that flipping properties is illegal.
User avatar
By bgwfreak
#21335
A friend and I talked about this this morning, it could be that they will sell to a big group that would have the capital to fund the parks (and future expansions, etc).

This may turn into a good thing, but I feel like we just did this 2 years ago...oh wait, we did!
By CoasterChris
#21337
Looks like CF bit off more than they could chew. Maybe they should have let another company buy the Paramount Parks.
By KenB
#21338
CF will have to refinance their debt load when their current deals expire. Rates will probably be significantly higher than what they are now the way trends are going. This may have affected their outlook on how soon they could pay off the debt, which makes going to a private equity group before they're in any actual trouble an attractive option.

Perhaps after running the Paramount Parks for a year they've seen that their profit estimates were a bit too rosy, and this will also make paying things off harder.

Going private isn't a sure sign of gloom and doom. Doing so when you're still healthy is much better than doing it when you're in the state that Six Flags was in. Not having to worry about quarterly dividends and your stock price could allow the company more freedom to do improvements to the parks in the short term.

For example, stockholders will be probably be pressuring them to sell Geauga Lake before long if it continues to struggle. With the amount of land there and the lake it could be worth more to a developer than it currently is as an amusement park. Under private ownership, CF may have the time to get that park situated the way they want, and keep it as an amusement park.

The problem with that thinking is it would take an investor that was willing to wait awhile to see the returns on their money, and those returns wouldn't be as large as they could be with other investments. With the amount of money involved here, I'd be surprised to see anyone terribly interested in buying the chain and keeping it running the way it is now. More likely would be for an investor to come in with an eye towards selling poor performers or parks that were more valuable as a mall than as a park.

I hope this isn't a bad sign for the future, but I guess time will tell - again.

KenB
By UpperNick
#21339
CoasterChris wrote: Looks like CF bit off more than they could chew. Maybe they should have let another company buy the Paramount Parks.

Or maybe, they should have only brought most of the parks like Paramount did in 1992. I.E. Canada's Wonderland and Great America. I wonder if the management contract for Gilroy Gardens and Star Trek is worth anything?