General Carowinds discussion
User avatar
By Axel
#76207
Merthecat wrote:I'd much rather have a Windseeker than a SkyScreamer...even if the Windseeker breaks down once in a while.


I'd MUCH rather have a SkyScreamer than a Windseeker... even if SkyScreamer broke down almost weekly at one park or another like Windseeker. No comparison in the least for fun to me. Chains and wind at that height make for much more excitement on the SkyScreamers than a solid arm, limited motion and nothing but view (and wondering if you'll be stuck up there for hours) on the Windseekers.
#76259
I have a question, but I didn't want to make another thread for it. What if Paramount had owned Carowinds, but when Cedar Fair acquired the Paramount Parks, Matt Ouimet was CEO? How do you think the park would look today?
User avatar
By Jarsh
#76279
arby wrote:I also like Windseeker but I agree that SkyScreamer is more exciting although Windseeker has a nicer look to it.


I think the boxy structure and the different colors give the appearance edge to the SkyScreamers... during the day. Windseeker seems so... plain until night time. BUT - Great Adventure put a super awesome lighting package on their SkyScreamer so I think if all of them had this lighting package, they would take the win at night over Windseeker.

Six_Flags_Great_Adventure_565128_i0.jpg
Six_Flags_Great_Adventure_565128_i0.jpg (43.47KiB)Viewed 2669 times




Here's a video of it in action showing how it changes throught the ride: https://youtu.be/LMgTb2DUdcc
#76307
saxrokinhomo wrote:This may be off topic but not gonna lie I was really hoping to see more trees in that grassy patch between the pathways...Oh well

I agree I hope they eventually do that....