By Chris - August 11th, 2015, 1:54 pm
- August 11th, 2015, 1:54 pm
#82453
Now you're riding on Jarvis's coattails?
What some people need to consider is, it's hard to justify spending (just guessing, here) million(s) of dollars on a 40 year old ride. You can't promote a 40 year old coaster. You can't run advertisements about how you spent all this money repairing a 40 year old coaster. It's hard to justify spending that amount of money when the ridership is so low. Had their been constant lines, I'm sure they would have made the move.
FamousAmos wrote:coasterbruh wrote:But wait!!! There's more . . . But not on the 27th
Oh, yeah. There is certainly more. And I can't wait until they debut the new (content removed)
Now you're riding on Jarvis's coattails?
Jay wrote:YOU guys don't know that for sure. I've heard from enough sources that Thunder Road had major maintenance problems, stuff that required more than retracking by GCI wouldn't fix. Simply put, Thunder Road wasn't popular enough to spend that kind of money on it, while this waterpark addition will make it's money back extremely quickly. This isn't rocket surgery. Also don't tell me what I know. Thanks.
What some people need to consider is, it's hard to justify spending (just guessing, here) million(s) of dollars on a 40 year old ride. You can't promote a 40 year old coaster. You can't run advertisements about how you spent all this money repairing a 40 year old coaster. It's hard to justify spending that amount of money when the ridership is so low. Had their been constant lines, I'm sure they would have made the move.
