cdp123 wrote:How could a multi-million dollar Hotel/Restaraunt chain be so lame? No idea. It's why im dissapointed.
Thoughts/Opinions/Anyone seen them?
MY GOODNESS!!! The park is NOT owned by the hard rock resturant chain! Even the hotels arent own by them! The park "rents" out their name. For example, the Hard Rock hotel at universal orlando is actual a Loews hotel but uses the hardrock name. Sure enough hardrock is a multi-million franchise but they have nothing to do w/ the design of the park or anything. The park is owned by private investors or something like that. They just sit back and collect a check for letting them use their name!
Jarvis "God I hope im right lol" Morant.
RollerNut wrote:My thought is the name of the park itself is lame, almost as much as The Park at MOA. They could have atleast been creative and came up with something like Hard Rock's Rock N Roll Parasdise. Not to mention some of the major rides are no more creative namewise than Paramount Parks, it shows that former Paramount Parks Management is working down there in some departments.
Why don't you submit your resume and show them how its done...
The park isnt all "rock and roll" so why would they name the park that? See you already a misconception of the "hard rock" scheme of things.
And about the names of the rides/resturants...you have no clue dont ya? Why not wiki some of the names and you will actually find out the ties the attractions have to them, especially "cod piece fish and chips"
. Before you go bashing something make sure you do your research and know exactly what you are bashing!
