- August 27th, 2009, 8:30 am
#34397
wow, talk about re-rideability...
I hate to pee on the kid's parade, but as a medical professional, I have to wonder about the wisdom of riding THAT much in such a short period. I know how safe coasters are in general, and I know how much more dangerous it is to drive to the park than to ride the coaster, but if I were that kid's parents, I'd probably be a wee bit concerned...on the other hand, I guess 13 yr olds tend to be indestructible. Still....
Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 39, Issue 1, Pages 65-72 (January 2002)
Robert J. Braksiek, MD, David J. Roberts, MD
Amusement park injuries and deaths
Abstract
Media coverage of amusement park injuries has increased over the past several years, raising concern that amusement rides may be dangerous. Amusement park fatalities and increases in reported injuries have prompted proposed legislation to regulate the industry. Since 1979, the medical literature has published reports of 4 subdural hematomas, 4 internal carotid artery dissections, 2 vertebral artery dissections, 2 subarachnoid hemorrhages, 1 intraparenchymal hemorrhage, and 1 carotid artery thrombosis with stroke, all related to roller coaster rides. In this article, we review reports of amusement park injuries in the medical literature and Consumer Product Safety Commission data on the overall risk of injury. We also discuss the physics and the physiologic effects of roller coasters that may influence the type and severity of injuries. Although the risk of injury is low, emergency physicians are advised to include participation on thrill rides as part of their history, particularly when evaluating patients presenting with neurologic symptoms. [Braksiek RJ, Roberts DJ. Amusement park injuries and deaths. Ann Emerg Med. January 2002;39:65-72.]
