- August 19th, 2014, 4:57 pm
#61887
I really wasn't trying to be smart, lol. I'm simply trying to figure out how me confirming what is speculation has all of a sudden demonized me.
The only thing that I posted that confirmed anything was a black and white picture of the first drop - which apparently still didn't convince some folks on another site as they thought I made it in NL. And you can't really call it confirming when the blueprints reak of B&M and everyone already knew that's who it was anyway. Heck, up until a week or so ago I speculated MY version of the layout based on the leaked blueprints yet I'm the "leak" that told everyone everything about the ride. Pfft. I told everyone what I thought the ride would be based on the prints. Anything else is just ridiculous.
I speculated the colors based on deductive reasoning of what I was seeing at the plant in Ohio.
I speculated the height based on the newspaper article that was posted way back on Page 1 of this thread. I even wrongly speculated that the height would be 310' back on page 71.
I speculated what the name would be when I saw the trademark applications for the ones that came out.
I posted a very small image from the intro that showed nothing more than a honeycomb in blue and the word "Introd" in neon yellow. This didn't confirm or give away anything about the coaster as I made sure to only include the items that the park had included in their own teaser campaign.
For the love of coasters, can someone explain to me how I leaked anything? Especially anything that wasn't already known by most of the users that come to this board.
The only thing that I posted that confirmed anything was a black and white picture of the first drop - which apparently still didn't convince some folks on another site as they thought I made it in NL. And you can't really call it confirming when the blueprints reak of B&M and everyone already knew that's who it was anyway. Heck, up until a week or so ago I speculated MY version of the layout based on the leaked blueprints yet I'm the "leak" that told everyone everything about the ride. Pfft. I told everyone what I thought the ride would be based on the prints. Anything else is just ridiculous.
I speculated the colors based on deductive reasoning of what I was seeing at the plant in Ohio.
I speculated the height based on the newspaper article that was posted way back on Page 1 of this thread. I even wrongly speculated that the height would be 310' back on page 71.
I speculated what the name would be when I saw the trademark applications for the ones that came out.
I posted a very small image from the intro that showed nothing more than a honeycomb in blue and the word "Introd" in neon yellow. This didn't confirm or give away anything about the coaster as I made sure to only include the items that the park had included in their own teaser campaign.
For the love of coasters, can someone explain to me how I leaked anything? Especially anything that wasn't already known by most of the users that come to this board.
Last edited by Jarsh on August 20th, 2014, 8:18 am, edited 1 time in total.
~jarsh
***Happiness is like peeing your pants. Everyone can see it, but only you can feel the warmth.***
***Happiness is like peeing your pants. Everyone can see it, but only you can feel the warmth.***
